· AFC Champions League
Cong An Nhan Dan
ATT
5/10
DEF
5/10
vs
Kyoto Sanga FC
5/10
ATT
5/10
DEF
Scheduled· Tue 3 Nov · 12:15
Best Pick
Under 2.5
53%
Correct Score
Top
1-1
12.3%
8.12
Top
1-0
11.4%
8.74
2-1
9.2%
10.89
2-0
8.5%
11.73
0-1
8.3%
12.11
0-0
7.7%
13.04
1-2
6.6%
15.08
2-2
4.9%
20.22
147%
2.14TOP
X26%
3.86
227%
3.65
1X73%
X253%
1274%
Probable XI4-4-2
Nguyen
Anh
Tran
Hậu
Putros
Ly
Sabater
Long
Đô
Grafite
Vargas
Impact Player Hot Head
Lineups not yet announced — full squad analysis below
Cong An Nhan Dan21 players
46.8/ 99Average
Top Rated
1Dinh Bac NguyenFWD63
2Damià SabaterMID60
3Lê Phạm Thành LongMID60
Kyoto Sanga FC21 players
54.8/ 99Average
Top Rated
1Rafael Elias da Silva BatagliaFWD81
2Marco Túlio Oliveira LemosFWD64
3Yusuke IshidaDEF61
Cong An Nhan Dan34
PlayerOverall RatingImpactAggressionDiscipline
Dinh Bac Nguyen63685050
Damià Sabater60514972
Lê Phạm Thành Long60625256
Brayan Andrés Perea Vargas59515078
Đoàn Văn Hậu52605541
Bùi Hoàng Việt Anh50534550
Frans Putros48406052
Ngoc Tin Phan48523950
Van Toan Hoang46454550
Alan Grafite46424161
David Henen46464550
Filip Nguyen45438250
Dinh Trong Tran45454550
Kyoto Sanga FC39
PlayerOverall RatingImpactAggressionDiscipline
Rafael Elias da Silva Bataglia81856267
Marco Túlio Oliveira Lemos64733950
Yusuke Ishida61595261
Hisashi Appiah Tawiah60465672
Maceió60477078
Sung-Jun Yoon57515661
Kyo Sato56495461
Thiago56475861
Alex Souza56535561
Hiroto Morooka55565750
Kodai Nagata53594350
Weverton53554456
Haruki Arai53485656
Player Rankings
Snipers
Top goal threats
1
Rafael Elias da Silva BatagliaKyoto Sanga FC
85
2
Marco Túlio Oliveira LemosKyoto Sanga FC
73
3
Dinh Bac NguyenCong An Nhan Dan
68
4
Alex SouzaKyoto Sanga FC
53
5
Brayan Andrés Perea VargasCong An Nhan Dan
51
Wall
Top defenders
1
Đoàn Văn HậuCong An Nhan Dan
60
2
Kodai NagataKyoto Sanga FC
59
3
Yusuke IshidaKyoto Sanga FC
59
4
WevertonKyoto Sanga FC
55
5
Bùi Hoàng Việt AnhCong An Nhan Dan
53
Control
Top playmakers
1
João Pedro Mendes SantosKyoto Sanga FC
65
2
Lê Phạm Thành LongCong An Nhan Dan
62
3
Hiroto MorookaKyoto Sanga FC
56
4
Ryuma NakanoKyoto Sanga FC
54
5
Shimpei FukuokaKyoto Sanga FC
54
Bad Boys
Most likely to get booked
1
Stefan MaukCong An Nhan Dan
4
2
Leygley AdouCong An Nhan Dan
24
3
Lê Văn ĐôCong An Nhan Dan
27
4
Nguyễn Quang HảiCong An Nhan Dan
27
5
João Pedro Mendes SantosKyoto Sanga FC
27
Power Rankings
Strongest overall
1
Rafael Elias da Silva BatagliaKyoto Sanga FC
81
2
Marco Túlio Oliveira LemosKyoto Sanga FC
64
3
Dinh Bac NguyenCong An Nhan Dan
63
4
Yusuke IshidaKyoto Sanga FC
61
5
Damià SabaterCong An Nhan Dan
60

Frequently Asked Questions

Our Poisson model calculates the probability of every possible scoreline for Cong An Nhan Dan vs Kyoto Sanga FC based on each team's expected goals (xG). The top-3 most likely scorelines are shown above with their probability percentages. Even the highest-probability score rarely exceeds 12-15% chance, as football is a low-scoring sport.

The Bet Builder combines multiple selections from the Cong An Nhan Dan vs Kyoto Sanga FC match into one bet. Our AI identifies outcomes that complement each other — for example, a home win paired with over 2.5 goals and both teams to score. All selections must win for the combined bet to pay out, which means higher combined odds but also higher risk.

xG (expected goals) measures the quality of scoring chances. If Cong An Nhan Dan has an xG of 1.8, it means they are expected to score around 1-2 goals based on chance quality. The model uses pre-match xG to build a probability table for all possible scorelines. A team can overperform xG (score more than expected) or underperform xG (score fewer).

Yes, all predictions on ProSoccer are completely free. You can view predicted scorelines, over/under probabilities, and bet builder suggestions for Cong An Nhan Dan vs Kyoto Sanga FC without paying or registering. Odds values are revealed after a tap to keep the page compliant with search engine guidelines.

A value bet occurs when the probability of an outcome is higher than what the bookmaker odds suggest. For example, if our model gives Cong An Nhan Dan a 55% chance of winning but the odds imply only 40%, that is a value bet. Our AI highlights selections where the model probability exceeds the implied probability from the odds.

AI predictions use statistical modeling (Poisson distribution) based on historical data and pre-match metrics. They are more reliable over large samples than for any single match. No prediction is guaranteed — football has inherent unpredictability. Our model typically identifies the correct top-3 scorelines in 25-30% of matches, which is significantly better than random chance.

HubTodayLiveCorrect ScoreAI SignalsPlayer props