Leverkusen’s home pressure should dictate the tempo, while Stuttgart’s dangerous attack gives this contest a genuine two-way edge. With both sides projecting meaningful chances and defensive vulnerabilities, goals appear likely to keep arriving.
Match GoalsOver 2.5
Migliore scelta
GOL DI ENTRAMBE
65%
Risultato esatto
Eccellente
1-1
9.6%
10.00
Eccellente
2-1
9.3%
9.50
1-0
6.8%
15.00
1-2
6.8%
15.00
2-2
6.6%
11.00
2-0
6.6%
15.00
3-1
6%
12.00
0-1
4.9%
23.00
150%
1.75TOP
X22%
4.20
228%
3.80
1X72%
X250%
1278%
Confirmed XI4-3-3
1
Flekken
4
Quansah
12
Tapsoba
2
Medina
3
Gutiérrez
24
García
6
Fernández
10
Tillman
30
Maza
23
Tella
14
Schick
Impact Player Hot Head
Bayer 04 Leverkusen29 giocatori
50.1/ 99Medio
Migliori
1Christian KofaneFWD79
2Ezequiel FernándezMID77
3Victor BonifaceFWD77
VfB Stuttgart31 giocatori
51.2/ 99Medio
Migliori
1Deniz UndavFWD87
2Jeff ChabotDEF81
3Jeremy ArévaloFWD79
Classifiche giocatori
Cecchini
Maggior minaccia di gol
1
Jeremy ArévaloVfB Stuttgart
99
2
Victor BonifaceBayer 04 Leverkusen
95
3
Deniz UndavVfB Stuttgart
92
4
Patrik SchickBayer 04 Leverkusen
85
5
Leo Sauer VfB Stuttgart
79
Muro
Migliori difensori
1
Jeff ChabotVfB Stuttgart
77
2
Loïc Badé Bayer 04 Leverkusen
64
3
Leonidas Stergiou VfB Stuttgart
59
4
Dan-Axel ZagadouVfB Stuttgart
58
5
Ameen Al-DakhilVfB Stuttgart
53
Controllo
Migliori registi
1
Exequiel Palacios Bayer 04 Leverkusen
99
2
Aleix GarcíaBayer 04 Leverkusen
97
3
Angelo StillerVfB Stuttgart
87
4
Ezequiel FernándezBayer 04 Leverkusen
71
5
Bilal El KhannoussVfB Stuttgart
60
Cattivi ragazzi
Più propensi ai cartellini
1
Aleix GarcíaBayer 04 Leverkusen
1
Aggressività 22
2
Exequiel Palacios Bayer 04 Leverkusen
1
Aggressività 38
3
Chema AndrésVfB Stuttgart
1
Aggressività 65
4
Jovan MilosevicVfB Stuttgart
1
Aggressività 52
5
Tiago TomásVfB Stuttgart
1
Aggressività 68
Classifica potenza
Più forti in assoluto
1
Deniz UndavVfB Stuttgart
87
2
Jeff ChabotVfB Stuttgart
81
3
Christian KofaneBayer 04 Leverkusen
79
4
Jeremy ArévaloVfB Stuttgart
79
5
Angelo StillerVfB Stuttgart
78
Domande frequenti
Our Poisson model calculates the probability of every possible scoreline for Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs VfB Stuttgart based on each team's expected goals (xG). The top-3 most likely scorelines are shown above with their probability percentages. Even the highest-probability score rarely exceeds 12-15% chance, as football is a low-scoring sport.
The Bet Builder combines multiple selections from the Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs VfB Stuttgart match into one bet. Our AI identifies outcomes that complement each other — for example, a home win paired with over 2.5 goals and both teams to score. All selections must win for the combined bet to pay out, which means higher combined odds but also higher risk.
xG (expected goals) measures the quality of scoring chances. If Bayer 04 Leverkusen has an xG of 1.8, it means they are expected to score around 1-2 goals based on chance quality. The model uses pre-match xG to build a probability table for all possible scorelines. A team can overperform xG (score more than expected) or underperform xG (score fewer).
Yes, all predictions on ProSoccer are completely free. You can view predicted scorelines, over/under probabilities, and bet builder suggestions for Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs VfB Stuttgart without paying or registering. Odds values are revealed after a tap to keep the page compliant with search engine guidelines.
A value bet occurs when the probability of an outcome is higher than what the bookmaker odds suggest. For example, if our model gives Bayer 04 Leverkusen a 55% chance of winning but the odds imply only 40%, that is a value bet. Our AI highlights selections where the model probability exceeds the implied probability from the odds.
AI predictions use statistical modeling (Poisson distribution) based on historical data and pre-match metrics. They are more reliable over large samples than for any single match. No prediction is guaranteed — football has inherent unpredictability. Our model typically identifies the correct top-3 scorelines in 25-30% of matches, which is significantly better than random chance.